
The Supreme Court emphasized that high courts should not intervene in trial court orders unless there is a clear distortion of facts and law, reinstating the acquittal of two individuals sentenced to life. The court highlighted the need for proof beyond a reasonable doubt and criticized judgments based on assumptions.

The Supreme Court emphasized that high courts should not intervene in trial court orders unless there is a clear distortion of facts and law, reinstating the acquittal of two individuals sentenced to life. The court highlighted the need for proof beyond a reasonable doubt and criticized judgments based on assumptions.
from India News | Latest India News Headlines & Live Updates from India - Times of India

The Supreme Court emphasized that high courts should not intervene in trial court orders unless there is a clear distortion of facts and law, reinstating the acquittal of two individuals sentenced to life. The court highlighted the need for proof beyond a reasonable doubt and criticized judgments based on assumptions.
via
IFTTT
0 Comments